• Home
  • Politics
  • Health
  • World
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • More
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
What's Hot

100 Funny Father’s Day Quotes for Hilariously Relatable Humor (and Plenty of Love Too)

May 8, 2025

Top 10 Benefits Of Acupuncture

May 8, 2025

Electric Vehicle Sales Nosedive As GOP Takes Buzzsaw To Biden’s Mandate

May 7, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Thursday, May 8
Patriot Now NewsPatriot Now News
  • Home
  • Politics

    Security video shows brazen sexual assault of California woman by homeless man

    October 24, 2023

    Woman makes disturbing discovery after her boyfriend chases away home intruder who stabbed him

    October 24, 2023

    Poll finds Americans overwhelmingly support Israel’s war on Hamas, but younger Americans defend Hamas

    October 24, 2023

    Off-duty pilot charged with 83 counts of attempted murder after allegedly trying to shut off engines midflight on Alaska Airlines

    October 23, 2023

    Leaked audio of Shelia Jackson Lee abusively cursing staffer

    October 22, 2023
  • Health

    Disparities In Cataract Care Are A Sorry Sight

    October 16, 2023

    Vaccine Stocks—Including Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech And Novavax—Slide Amid Plummeting Demand

    October 16, 2023

    Long-term steroid use should be a last resort

    October 16, 2023

    Rite Aid Files For Bankruptcy With More ‘Underperforming Stores’ To Close

    October 16, 2023

    Who’s Still Dying From Complications Related To Covid-19?

    October 16, 2023
  • World

    New York Democrat Dan Goldman Accuses ‘Conservatives in the South’ of Holding Rallies with ‘Swastikas’

    October 13, 2023

    IDF Ret. Major General Describes Rushing to Save Son, Granddaughter During Hamas Invasion

    October 13, 2023

    Black Lives Matter Group Deletes Tweet Showing Support for Hamas 

    October 13, 2023

    AOC Denounces NYC Rally Cheering Hamas Terrorism: ‘Unacceptable’

    October 13, 2023

    L.A. Prosecutors Call Out Soros-Backed Gascón for Silence on Israel

    October 13, 2023
  • Business

    Electric Vehicle Sales Nosedive As GOP Takes Buzzsaw To Biden’s Mandate

    May 7, 2025

    Tyson Foods Announces It Will Bend The Knee To Trump Admin’s New Rules

    May 7, 2025

    Federal Reserve Holds Interest Rates Steady Despite Pressure From Trump

    May 7, 2025

    ‘Wait Them Out’: John Kennedy Tells Larry Kudlow One Lie He Suspects China’s Telling US

    May 7, 2025

    Senator Murphy Tries To Ban Trump’s Meme Coin With ‘MEME Act’

    May 6, 2025
  • Finance

    Ending China’s De Minimis Exception Brings 3 Benefits for Americans

    April 17, 2025

    The Trump Tariff Shock Should Push Indonesia to Reform Its Economy

    April 17, 2025

    Tariff Talks an Opportunity to Reinvigorate the Japan-US Alliance

    April 17, 2025

    How China’s Companies Are Responding to the US Trade War

    April 16, 2025

    The US Flip-flop Over H20 Chip Restrictions 

    April 16, 2025
  • Tech

    Cruz Confronts Zuckerberg on Pointless Warning for Child Porn Searches

    February 2, 2024

    FTX Abandons Plans to Relaunch Crypto Exchange, Commits to Full Repayment of Customers and Creditors

    February 2, 2024

    Elon Musk Proposes Tesla Reincorporates in Texas After Delaware Judge Voids Pay Package

    February 2, 2024

    Tesla’s Elon Musk Tops Disney’s Bob Iger as Most Overrated Chief Executive

    February 2, 2024

    Mark Zuckerberg’s Wealth Grew $84 Billion in 2023 as Pedophiles Target Children on Facebook, Instagram

    February 2, 2024
  • More
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
Patriot Now NewsPatriot Now News
Home»Finance»After APEC: Whither US Leadership on Trade?
Finance

After APEC: Whither US Leadership on Trade?

December 15, 2023No Comments7 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
After APEC: Whither US Leadership on Trade?
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

For the United States, the November meeting of APEC was widely seen as an opportunity to demonstrate its leadership and long-term commitment to the organization and the Asia-Pacific region. It was expected that a key part of this would be the announcement of substantial agreement and progress on the Indo-Pacific Economic Partnership for Prosperity (IPEF). 

IPEF had been  triumphantly  announced at the May 23, 2022, Tokyo meeting of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad). It was billed by the United States as the first of a new form of trade platform aimed at non-tariff barriers, benefiting workers, supply chains, and competition with China. 

The grouping comprises four pillars: trade; supply chains; clean energy, decarbonization, and infrastructure; and tax and anti-corruption. Each of these areas would be the focus of negotiations on separate agreements, which any IPEF member could opt into (or out of). While it all sounded highly aspirational — albeit lacking in detail — 13 regional countries signed up for the initial launch: Australia, Brunei, Fiji,  India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. Eleven of those 13 are members of APEC (with Fiji and India as the only exceptions). 

The November 2023 APEC summit was supposed to be a celebration of IPEF’s achievements. However, APEC was overshadowed by the intense focus on the summit between Chinese President XI Jinping and U.S. President Joe Biden, as well as the very clear lack of agreement of members with the U.S. position on the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine conflicts – reflected  in the remarkably carefully worded concluding APEC statement. 

In some ways this diversion was perhaps welcome, because it shifted attention away from the serious weakening of the IPEF announcement arising out of failure by the Biden administration to obtain the necessary Democratic and congressional support for the agreement on the trade pillar.

While it was possible to announce substantial progress on the other three pillars, much in these agreements is nonbinding and generally non-controversial among signatories, particularly given how the  proposals relate to the progress of existing regional agreements and the limited level of initial commitment that signing involves. 

See also  3M Rallies, Is Disney For Sale?

The failure of the IPEF trade pillar sends a clear message to signatories and APEC as a whole. This has to be seen in terms of how both the United States and regional Asian governments perceive the merits of its trade provisions.

First, there was less than enthusiastic support at the outset for the entire agreement in the Asia-Pacific. It is certainly no replacement for the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which the United States has refused to consider joining since withdrawing from its predecessor agreement. Many IPEF members are likely to have signed up because they had no wish to antagonize the United States, rather than out of the expectations of concrete benefits.  

Even so, the various Southeast Asian members, especially Indonesia and Vietnam, were disappointed by the standstill in access to the U.S. market, despite being required to accept binding commitments on higher domestic standards for labor and the environment along with former being enforced by a dispute settlement mechanism similar to the U.S.-Canada-Mexico free trade accord. 

Without a quid pro quo, it would be difficult for Southeast Asian governments to justify joining the trade deal. Typically, binding commitments on higher non-trade standards come with tariff concessions and removal of non-tariff barriers, which may be re-imposed should partner countries fail to enforce new standards. Southeast Asian government might have been willing to accept meaningful non-market access incentives – such as incentives for technology transfer and investment – but these were not on offer, either. 

For Jakarta, another unresolved area of contention involves the large “green” subsidies available under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act to American businesses, a policy that threatens to undermine competitors from less financially powerful economies.

See also  EXCLUSIVE: Leadership Of Major US Landowner Chock-Full Of Chinese Communist Party Members

Southeast Asian governments’ skepticism was likely reinforced by high expectations derived from their constructive experiences in other, more open regional trade agreements not involving the United States – including the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Additionally, four of the IPEF Southeast Asian economies also participate in the even deeper market-opening CPTPP.  

In line with these developments, Southeast Asian economies are increasingly prioritizing deals with their fastest growing and principal trade partner: China. In bolstering these expectations, at a dinner in San Francisco shortly following the APEC summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced plans to join the CPTPP by aligning with its standards, in addition to expanding a worldwide network of high-standard free trade regions.

Beyond all these IPEF-specific concerns is a bigger issue. Regardless of the assertions of the Biden administration, the fact that domestic politics stymied IPEF reflects a failure to prioritize and casts doubt on U.S. support and commitment to the region (and APEC). The current limited levels of support for Asia-Pacific trade engagement might well fade with the next administration – as it did under former President Donald Trump.

More widely, behind all this lurks the suspicion that the United States has lost interest in APEC as a regional body. Many governments both inside and outside of the region view the organization as lacking any capacity to initiate significant regional development and change. 

While some member governments may see APEC as fulfilling certain important coordinating roles, as with the Conference of the Parties (COP), and in lobbying for World Trade Organization (WTO) reform, its value is perceived increasingly in terms of sideline meetings, floating of ideas, networking for business connections, and general regional interaction of members – not least with China, Taiwan, and the United States as high-profile members.  

The world has changed since 1989, when APEC was founded. The very significant roles that it played in establishing regional trade and technology arrangements have been overtaken by a wide range of bodies that have gained prominence since the end of the Cold War, including ASEAN, ASEAN+3, RCEP, and CPTPP, and rising new geoeconomic and geopolitical forces.

See also  Trump Makes First New Hampshire Stop For 2024 Campaign, Announces Leadership Team

There is also concern that the United States has no vision for the Asia-Pacific or its broader and more recent strategic conceptualization in the form of the Indo-Pacific, only seeing each through the lens of its China policy. In this regard, the region has become the central arena for the playing out of intensifying China-U.S. rivalry, largely involving member countries as vehicles for Washington’s policies of containing Chinese economic and political advancement. This involves pushing back on China’s regional and global roles and putting pressure on countries to choose sides while  maintaining or reasserting U.S. regional leadership, 

It is clear that as a result of the IPEF trade pillar failure at APEC, the United States will need to re-double its efforts in making progress over the next year, if it still hopes to elevate IPEF as a key institution for the advancement of trade among its signatories and the broader APEC membership.  

It is also clear that Southeast Asian countries are willing to continue negotiations of the IPEF trade pillar, and they will be crucial to its future prospects. These largely developing nations have strategically crafted their capabilities in pooling sovereignty to forge new multilateral institutions and agreements over the recent decade. Now they are increasingly taking center-stage in breathing new life into sometimes failing or stalled international agreements, just as was the case with both RCEP and the CPTPP at one stage. Equally, in terms of IPEF’s defunct trade pillar, its Southeast Asian member states are likely to be at the helm of driving forward an inclusivist, broader regional trade agenda.

APEC Leadership trade
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Trump Admin Ready To Provide Another Round Of Financial Aid To Farmers Impacted By China Trade War

April 28, 2025

‘They Came With Their A Game’: Donald Trump, Scott Bessent Reveal Which Country Could Be Close To Making Trade Deal

April 24, 2025

Ending China’s De Minimis Exception Brings 3 Benefits for Americans

April 17, 2025

The Trump Tariff Shock Should Push Indonesia to Reform Its Economy

April 17, 2025
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

French and Russian Sailors Rescued From Shark Attack Boat

September 7, 2023

Megan Rapinoe Says Highlight of Her Career Was Getting Equal Pay

August 7, 2023

Defense Company Profits Leveled Off But Stocks Soared In 2022

August 7, 2023

Fan Violently Tackled by Security for Running on Field After Alabama-Tennessee Game

October 22, 2023
Don't Miss

100 Funny Father’s Day Quotes for Hilariously Relatable Humor (and Plenty of Love Too)

Lifestyle May 8, 2025

Father’s Day is that special day of the year when we not only celebrate our…

Top 10 Benefits Of Acupuncture

May 8, 2025

Electric Vehicle Sales Nosedive As GOP Takes Buzzsaw To Biden’s Mandate

May 7, 2025

Tyson Foods Announces It Will Bend The Knee To Trump Admin’s New Rules

May 7, 2025
About
About

This is your World, Tech, Health, Entertainment and Sports website. We provide the latest breaking news straight from the News industry.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
Categories
  • Business (4,109)
  • Entertainment (4,220)
  • Finance (3,202)
  • Health (1,938)
  • Lifestyle (1,626)
  • Politics (3,084)
  • Sports (4,036)
  • Tech (2,006)
  • Uncategorized (4)
  • World (3,944)
Our Picks

UAW And Ford Negotiators Reach Agreement On New Contract

October 26, 2023

U.S. antitrust enforcer says pressing on with fight against Microsoft/Activision deal

October 13, 2023

EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna Introduces Resolution To Remove Adam Schiff From The House

May 18, 2023
Popular Posts

100 Funny Father’s Day Quotes for Hilariously Relatable Humor (and Plenty of Love Too)

May 8, 2025

Top 10 Benefits Of Acupuncture

May 8, 2025

Electric Vehicle Sales Nosedive As GOP Takes Buzzsaw To Biden’s Mandate

May 7, 2025
© 2025 Patriotnownews.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.