• Home
  • Politics
  • Health
  • World
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • More
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
What's Hot

Microsoft Bans Employees From Using ‘Chinese Propaganda’ Chatbot

May 9, 2025

How Smart Mattresses Improve Sleep Quality For Couples

May 9, 2025

OpenAI CEO Warns: ‘Not A Huge Amount Of Time’ Until China Overpowers American AI

May 9, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Friday, May 9
Patriot Now NewsPatriot Now News
  • Home
  • Politics

    Security video shows brazen sexual assault of California woman by homeless man

    October 24, 2023

    Woman makes disturbing discovery after her boyfriend chases away home intruder who stabbed him

    October 24, 2023

    Poll finds Americans overwhelmingly support Israel’s war on Hamas, but younger Americans defend Hamas

    October 24, 2023

    Off-duty pilot charged with 83 counts of attempted murder after allegedly trying to shut off engines midflight on Alaska Airlines

    October 23, 2023

    Leaked audio of Shelia Jackson Lee abusively cursing staffer

    October 22, 2023
  • Health

    Disparities In Cataract Care Are A Sorry Sight

    October 16, 2023

    Vaccine Stocks—Including Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech And Novavax—Slide Amid Plummeting Demand

    October 16, 2023

    Long-term steroid use should be a last resort

    October 16, 2023

    Rite Aid Files For Bankruptcy With More ‘Underperforming Stores’ To Close

    October 16, 2023

    Who’s Still Dying From Complications Related To Covid-19?

    October 16, 2023
  • World

    New York Democrat Dan Goldman Accuses ‘Conservatives in the South’ of Holding Rallies with ‘Swastikas’

    October 13, 2023

    IDF Ret. Major General Describes Rushing to Save Son, Granddaughter During Hamas Invasion

    October 13, 2023

    Black Lives Matter Group Deletes Tweet Showing Support for Hamas 

    October 13, 2023

    AOC Denounces NYC Rally Cheering Hamas Terrorism: ‘Unacceptable’

    October 13, 2023

    L.A. Prosecutors Call Out Soros-Backed Gascón for Silence on Israel

    October 13, 2023
  • Business

    Microsoft Bans Employees From Using ‘Chinese Propaganda’ Chatbot

    May 9, 2025

    OpenAI CEO Warns: ‘Not A Huge Amount Of Time’ Until China Overpowers American AI

    May 9, 2025

    Trump Announces First Post-Tariff Trade Deal

    May 8, 2025

    Electric Vehicle Sales Nosedive As GOP Takes Buzzsaw To Biden’s Mandate

    May 7, 2025

    Tyson Foods Announces It Will Bend The Knee To Trump Admin’s New Rules

    May 7, 2025
  • Finance

    Ending China’s De Minimis Exception Brings 3 Benefits for Americans

    April 17, 2025

    The Trump Tariff Shock Should Push Indonesia to Reform Its Economy

    April 17, 2025

    Tariff Talks an Opportunity to Reinvigorate the Japan-US Alliance

    April 17, 2025

    How China’s Companies Are Responding to the US Trade War

    April 16, 2025

    The US Flip-flop Over H20 Chip Restrictions 

    April 16, 2025
  • Tech

    Cruz Confronts Zuckerberg on Pointless Warning for Child Porn Searches

    February 2, 2024

    FTX Abandons Plans to Relaunch Crypto Exchange, Commits to Full Repayment of Customers and Creditors

    February 2, 2024

    Elon Musk Proposes Tesla Reincorporates in Texas After Delaware Judge Voids Pay Package

    February 2, 2024

    Tesla’s Elon Musk Tops Disney’s Bob Iger as Most Overrated Chief Executive

    February 2, 2024

    Mark Zuckerberg’s Wealth Grew $84 Billion in 2023 as Pedophiles Target Children on Facebook, Instagram

    February 2, 2024
  • More
    • Sports
    • Entertainment
    • Lifestyle
Patriot Now NewsPatriot Now News
Home»Finance»Toward Germany-South Korea Cooperation in Economic Security 
Finance

Toward Germany-South Korea Cooperation in Economic Security 

April 24, 2024No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Toward Germany-South Korea Cooperation in Economic Security 
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Middle powers such as South Korea and Germany are at risk of becoming victims of great power politics in light of growing China-U.S. frictions. Faced with similar challenges from trade protectionism, export controls, and rising Chinese competition in key industries, identifying commonalities and differences between both countries provides a starting point for analyzing their economic statecraft, while also helping to explore possibilities for bilateral cooperation that leverages their respective industrial strengths. 

The ratios of manufacturing share to GDP in South Korea and Germany are some of the highest among major industrialized countries, at 25.6 percent and 18.4 percent respectively in 2022. South Korea’s and Germany’s industrial strength has enabled both countries to continue to occupy vital hub positions in regional value chains in Europe and Asia. Their companies supply other economies with critical inputs such as machinery, chemicals, or electronics and other high value equipment, particularly vehicles and transportation equipment. 

In response to recently unfolding geopolitical risks that are reshaping globalization, governments are scrambling to make appropriate policy adjustments. But implementing these changes is easier said than done as it may raise tensions between governments and companies. Striking the right balance between respective security and economic interest is a delicate task, as formulating policy responses may run the risk of over-securitization.

In South Korea and Germany, the evolving policy responses place high priority on mitigating structural vulnerabilities, especially those related to China. In Germany and Europe, policy responses run under the label of “de-risking” while in South Korea the approach has shifted to the concept of “continuity and change.” While the names might be different, the main building blocks share very similar features: reducing dependencies on a single country, enhancing supply chain resilience, and strengthening tech sovereignty. 

But there are substantial differences in the details and drivers for the ongoing policy changes. China-related vulnerabilities, including the importance of the Chinese market, are equally seen as risks in both countries. But unlike South Korea Germany has avoided the fate of being directly targeted by Chinese economic coercion. Potentially emerging economic vulnerabilities were only a vague concern until the mid-2010s in the wake of China’s economic coercion against South Korea. 

See also  China and Russia May Be Expanding Natural Gas Cooperation – Just Not Via Power of Siberia 2

In 2016, the Chinese government responded to South Korea’s decision to deploy Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), a U.S. missile defense system, with de facto economic sanctions affecting a wide range of sectors, including retail, entertainment, tourism, and content services. Even more problematic were the indirect effects of Chinese measures on South Korean companies’ businesses in China. The automotive, smartphone, and display industries, which were not directly targeted by the sanctions, saw their market share in China decline sharply after 2017.

This bitter experience has been a decisive factor in shaping South Korea’s economic statecraft, both to reduce overdependence on China but also improve overall resilience. In response companies and the government are working in sync in South Korea’s national interest with the aim of strengthening industrial competitiveness and reducing structural vulnerabilities.

But the issue of economic coercion is not only a factor related to China. For example, in August 2019, tensions with Japan escalated after a South Korean court ordered Japanese companies to pay compensation for wartime forced labor. In response, Japan’s government removed South Korea from the whitelist to control the export of key materials essential for semiconductor and display manufacturing, again highlighting South Korea’s economic vulnerabilities. Although Japan lifted the export controls in March 2023, the case aroused widespread recognition in South Korea that a strategy focused on strengthening the supply chain resilience of key industries was needed. 

Realizing that economic opportunities can be turned into a risk, South Korea needed to achieve a more nuanced approach that balances diversification with self-sufficiency in high technologies. This approach, which can be termed “techno-economic statecraft,” leverages South Korea’s manufacturing prowess in key high-tech industries. High technology becomes a tool for deterring economic coercion and fostering international cooperation. 

See also  Dow Jones Futures Fall: Market Rally Holds Up; Hot Megacaps Tesla, Nvidia In Focus

For instance, in July 2020, the South Korean government implemented the “Materials, Parts, and Equipment Strategy 2.0.” This initiative fosters a collaborative domestic ecosystem, aiming to transform Korean companies into central hubs and vital partners within global supply chains. This enabled South Korea to mitigate structural vulnerabilities in general – not only China related ones – while expanding international cooperation with the United States, Europe, and Southeast Asia.

South Korea managed to limit the impact of economic coercion on the competitiveness of its key high-tech industries. For example, even though Samsung’s smartphone sales disintegrated in China, the company maintained or even increased its position in global markets due to its competitiveness. Rather than getting caught up in excessive fear of economic coercion or trouble in the Chinese market, this example shows it is effective to carry out proactive economic statecraft and international cooperation with like-minded countries. 

Both South Korea and Germany are faced with a complex situation requiring policy adjustments to balance economic security and opportunities. Despite the growing risks, it is not desirable to exaggerate the fears, as it is likely to lead to costly overreaction. In order to deepen and expand economic security cooperation, South Korea and Germany should start by cultivating mutual understanding of their respective economic security strategies and sharing experiences in addressing strategic challenges.

First, South Korea and Germany should share best practices and lessons learned in order to maximize the synergies of cooperation based on their complementarities. This initiative would foster the exchange of best practices and insights gleaned from navigating strategic challenges such as the China-U.S. strategic competition, the COVID-19 pandemic, and recent supply chain disruptions affecting shipping. 

See also  Lessons From Lithuania: How ASEAN Can Manage Economic Risks With China

Second, South Korea and Germany should pursue strategic cooperation that goes beyond individual industries and aligns with their broader national strategies. Both should expand traditional S&T cooperation to high-tech industries such as semiconductors, batteries, automobiles, and artificial intelligence (AI). For example, South Korean giants such as  Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix possess leading AI chip production capabilities, which creates natural synergies for collaboration with German companies. 

Third, South Korea and Germany can use bilateral cooperation as a platform to promote regional cooperation between Asia and Europe. The transnational nature of economic security challenges requires a global response. Jointly promoting regional cooperation in Asia can facilitate diversification by coordinating on developing alternative industrial clusters in highly exposed areas which were identified by its companies. 

Expanding cooperation with South Korea can help foster policy change in Germany by focusing less on regulation and restrictions on companies as a hallmark of economic security and instead provide new opportunities for companies. There is a realization in Germany that change is needed, but policy implementation is still rather slow and too often driven by fear of Chinese retaliation. De-risking remains mainly a concept that focuses on defensive measures and its effectiveness is restrained by tensions between government and companies. 

South Korea, with a far larger exposure to the Chinese economy, provides some pragmatic lessons in finding a policy response that is centered around economic competitiveness as a key feature for improved economic security. Stronger Germany-South Korea cooperation in economic security could help foster stronger competitiveness of both countries’ companies and help resist policies that risk over-securitization.  

Cooperation Economic GermanySouth Korea security
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Trump’s Tariffs Trigger Turmoil In China As Country’s Economic Tailspin Intensifies Per New Data

May 6, 2025

Ending China’s De Minimis Exception Brings 3 Benefits for Americans

April 17, 2025

The Trump Tariff Shock Should Push Indonesia to Reform Its Economy

April 17, 2025

Tariff Talks an Opportunity to Reinvigorate the Japan-US Alliance

April 17, 2025
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

‘All-Out Assault’: Things Are About To Bust Wide Open Between Trump, DeSantis

May 24, 2023

Russia Finally Cuts Crude Exports, at Most Opportune Moment

July 13, 2023

Elon Musk’s Starlink Falls Short of SpaceX Subscriber Projections by 92.5%

September 20, 2023

As lithium miners gear up for first-quarter earnings, investors focus on tumbling prices

May 3, 2023
Don't Miss

Microsoft Bans Employees From Using ‘Chinese Propaganda’ Chatbot

Business May 9, 2025

Microsoft has banned employees from using DeepSeek — the viral Chinese chatbot it worries is…

How Smart Mattresses Improve Sleep Quality For Couples

May 9, 2025

OpenAI CEO Warns: ‘Not A Huge Amount Of Time’ Until China Overpowers American AI

May 9, 2025

Short and Funny Sayings for a Happy Summer with Friends

May 9, 2025
About
About

This is your World, Tech, Health, Entertainment and Sports website. We provide the latest breaking news straight from the News industry.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
Categories
  • Business (4,112)
  • Entertainment (4,220)
  • Finance (3,202)
  • Health (1,938)
  • Lifestyle (1,628)
  • Politics (3,084)
  • Sports (4,036)
  • Tech (2,006)
  • Uncategorized (4)
  • World (3,944)
Our Picks

Migrants Breach Border, Push Small Children Under Texas Razor Wire

September 23, 2023

Director Lars Von Trier Attacked for Believing ‘Russian Lives Matter’

August 25, 2023

As lithium miners gear up for first-quarter earnings, investors focus on tumbling prices

May 3, 2023
Popular Posts

Microsoft Bans Employees From Using ‘Chinese Propaganda’ Chatbot

May 9, 2025

How Smart Mattresses Improve Sleep Quality For Couples

May 9, 2025

OpenAI CEO Warns: ‘Not A Huge Amount Of Time’ Until China Overpowers American AI

May 9, 2025
© 2025 Patriotnownews.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.