Estate planning has a blind spot. It’s called living.
getty
Most estate plans are built around a single event: death.
Attorneys draft wills and trusts. Advisors create tax strategies. Beneficiaries are named. Assets are protected and prepared for transfer. This is important work. The harder question is what happens when illness arrives before death does — when a family spends ten years navigating illness, disability, cognitive decline or caregiving.
When a stroke, dementia, Parkinson’s disease or cancer occurs, the questions families face are rarely legal. Instead, they become practical and personal. Who will coordinate care? Which specialists should we trust? Can Mom safely remain at home? How do we navigate a healthcare system that is increasingly fragmented and difficult to understand? What happens when family members disagree about treatment decisions or levels of care?
Suddenly, it’s not about wealth transfer for the family. It’s about healthcare navigation.
The estate plan remains important, but it is no longer enough.
The Estate Planning Gap Few Families Anticipate
I have seen many families spend years — sometimes decades — managing complex health situations before anyone inherits anything. During this time, healthcare decisions can reshape both quality of life and financial outcomes. A family may have a well-constructed trust, tax strategies and a comprehensive succession plan. Yet none of those documents tell a family how to coordinate care for a loved one experiencing cognitive decline.
This planning gap exists because traditional estate planning tends to focus on what happens after death, while many of the most difficult and expensive challenges families face occur while everyone is still alive.
Why Incapacity Can Be More Complicated Than Death
Incapacity, in many cases, has become a greater planning challenge than death itself.
A generation ago, many of the illnesses that now shape family life would have shortened it. By 2030, every baby boomer will have reached age 65 or older. As a result, more families will find themselves navigating the intersection of health, caregiving and wealth preservation than ever before.
Today, people are living longer with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, heart disease and other chronic conditions. While that represents remarkable medical progress, it has also created a planning challenge that many families are unprepared for.
The issue is no longer whether health will affect an estate plan. The issue is that health often becomes the estate plan long before an estate is ever settled.
A prolonged period of diminished decision-making capacity can create family conflict, caregiver burnout, and unnecessary healthcare spending. The financial impact extends beyond the person receiving care. Nearly 2 in 10 employed caregivers report leaving the workforce entirely, while 4 in 10 reduce their working hours to care for a loved one. It can strain marriages, disrupt careers and place enormous pressure on adult children trying to balance their own families and professional obligations while simultaneously managing a parent’s care. None of these challenges are solved by a trust document alone.
What A Health Continuity Plan Should Include
What many families need is a health continuity plan.
Just as estate planning creates a roadmap for the transfer of assets, health planning creates a roadmap for the management of care. It answers questions before they become emergencies. It identifies decision-makers, clarifies treatment preferences and establishes a framework for coordinating care when emotions are high and time is limited.
A comprehensive health continuity plan should include current medical information, key physicians, insurance details, healthcare proxies, powers of attorney, advance directives and emergency contacts.
These documents matter because families often discover too late that the person they assumed would step in during a crisis may not have the legal authority to do so.
Trusts and estates attorney Michelle Lavoie Beyer says many families make assumptions about who can access medical information or make decisions on behalf of a loved one.
“The loved one a person intends to rely upon in such a situation might not be the individual statutorily designated to assume that role by default,” she says.
Unmarried couples can be particularly vulnerable to this issue.
“They may be dismayed to find out that they do not generally have any protected right to access their loved one’s health information — or even access to their loved one — without the patient’s express permission,” Beyer explains.” And by the time a crisis occurs, that permission may no longer be obtainable.”
It should also address practical questions that families often overlook until they are forced to confront them in a crisis. Who will attend specialist appointments? How will information be shared among family members? What resources are available if care needs suddenly increase? What are the family’s preferences regarding long-term care, home care or assisted living?
Beyer recommends pairing a Health Care Proxy with a Durable Power of Attorney so that healthcare and financial decisions can be coordinated when a loved one becomes incapacitated.
Attorney and owner of Law Mother Asset Protection and Estate Planning, Pamela Maass, sees families run into problems even when those documents exist.
“The problem I see constantly is that financial powers of attorney are either too broad or too limited. Too broad means you’ve handed someone a blank check with unfettered access to every account, every asset, with no guardrails. Too limited means when your family needs to do Medicaid planning to cover long term care costs, the document won’t allow it. Either way, families end up stuck. The drafting matters as much as having the document at all. By the time a family notices cognitive decline it is often too late to execute legal documents. The window closes fast.”
These conversations are not easy. But they are almost always easier than making those decisions in the middle of a medical emergency.
The Financial Cost Of Poor Health Planning
A family can spend years optimizing a tax strategy that saves tens of thousands of dollars while simultaneously remaining unprepared for a health event that costs hundreds of thousands. The lifetime cost of dementia care alone now exceeds $400,000 per person. Nationwide, Americans will spend an estimated $384 billion caring for people with Alzheimer’s and other dementias in 2025. Family caregivers will contribute another $415 billion in unpaid care. These are not merely healthcare costs. They are estate-planning costs, retirement-planning costs and family-wealth costs — just measured in hospital visits, caregiving hours and years of lost productivity instead of taxes and investment returns.
Family caregiving has become one of the largest invisible components of the American economy. The value of unpaid caregiving now exceeds $1 trillion annually — more than total Medicaid spending — yet most families still approach it as an unexpected personal challenge rather than a predictable planning event.
In many cases, the issue is not a lack of financial resources. It is a lack of informed guidance. Families may have the means to pay for care but struggle to determine which care is appropriate, which providers are best qualified or how to navigate an increasingly complex healthcare landscape. The result is often spending more than necessary, missing available resources and making decisions that families later wish they had approached differently.
Estate planning has traditionally focused on protecting assets. The next evolution may be protecting decision-making.
Because when a health crisis occurs, the greatest challenge is often not determining where assets go after death. It is determining who will make decisions, coordinate care and protect quality of life while everyone is still living.
The challenge is not that families fail to plan. In many cases, they plan extensively. The challenge is that planning remains heavily focused on the transfer of assets after death, while many of the most consequential financial, medical and family decisions occur before it.
As Americans live longer and spend more years managing chronic illness, cognitive decline and complex healthcare needs, the traditional boundaries between estate planning, financial planning and healthcare planning are beginning to blur.
Perhaps the question is no longer whether health planning should be part of estate planning.
Perhaps it is whether estate planning can truly be complete without it.